1455 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Phone: 727.449.9800
Fax: 727.446.2748
E-Mail: linda@lawyergriffin.com
Welcome About Linda S. Griffin The Lottery Tax Tips FAQ Contact
Wills, Trusts & Estates • Probate • Lottery • Estate Taxation

 

 

 


 

TAX TIPS AND MORE...
Mileage Rate For Reimbursement

by Linda Suzzanne Griffin

In Revenue Procedure 2003-76, 2003-43 IRB, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) announced that the mileage rate is now 37.5¢ for business travel after 2003. In 2003 the mileage rate is 36¢.

Advice:
Be sure to use this reimbursement rate beginning in 2004.

Substantiation For Charitable Deductions
In Weyts v. Comm’r., T.C. Memo 2003-68, the court once again reiterated the importance of substantiation for charitable deductions. Mr. Weyts paid $700 to attend a benefit to raise scholarship money and originally did not claim a charitable deduction. After his return was audited, he argued that he was entitled to deduct $620 of the $700 payment as the fair market value of his gift. The court applied Section 170(f)(8)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) which states that the contribution of $250 or more must be substantiated by “contemporaneous written acknowledgment.”

Mr. Weyts argued that the Cohan rule, Cohan v. Comm’r., 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930), should apply. The Cohan rule should be used when certainty is impossible, and not necessary. The court found that the Cohan rule was inappropriate, and that written substantiation was designed to increase compliance.

Advice:
Be sure that your clients understand that any time a charitable contribution over $250 is made they MUST receive a contemporaneous written acknowledgment. While this may seem a minor requirement, if this is not done, then the deduction is subject to disallowance.

Valuation Of Lottery Payments
For those fortunate enough to win the lottery, but unfortunate enough to die soon after, the Estate of Gribauskas (CA2 8/26/2003), provides your personal representative guidance on the valuation of the present value of lottery payments.

Normally, annuity payments are valued under Section 7520 of the Code valuation tables. The taxpayer argued that, instead of using the tables the value should be determined under the “willing buyer, willing seller” test using a lack of marketability discount. The IRS argued that the 7520 rates should apply.

In 1992, Mr. Gribauskas won almost $16 million in the Connecticut lottery, payable in 20 annual installments of about $790,000. The parties divorced soon after receiving the first payment, and in June of 1994 Mr. Gribauskas died . The taxpayer discounted the value of the remaining installment payments to account for restrictions; such as no accelerations under any circumstances, and no assignment or transferring of his right to future installments. After factoring in the market discount, the estate valued the winnings at about $2.6 million, and the IRS determined the value at $3.5 million in accordance with Section 7520 annuity tables.

The Second Circuit agreed with the estate, and rejected the IRS’s assertion that departure from the tables was inappropriate.

Advice:
If any of your clients have this type of situation, then this case is important to review. However, be careful to observe Florida law as to the specific discount factors. Furthermore, estate planning should always be provided as soon as an individual wins the lottery.

Unpaid Payroll Taxes From Single Member LLC
In Chief Counsel Advice 200338012, the IRS discussed how to collect unpaid payroll taxes from a bankrupt disregarded single member limited liability company (LLC). Generally, the owners are not liable for the debts of an LLC because an LLC is treated as a corporation. However, if a single member does not “check the box” to treat the LLC as a corporation, then the LLC is disregarded as a separate entity and is reported on Schedule C of the individual owner. Because the disregarded LLC is not treated separate from its owner, the single member owner is the taxpayer, and the IRS may collect liabilities by assessing the owner. Under state law, the owner does not have an interest in the LLC property. Thus, the IRS could not satisfy the owner’s tax liability from the LLC’s assets.

Advice:
This is important for your clients as more and more single LLCs are being formed. As in any other corporate situation, payroll tax liabilities are a major source of conflict with the IRS.

Tenancy-By-The-Entireties
Notice 2003-60, 2003-39 IRB (9/29/03) and U.S. v. Craft, 535 U.S. 274 (2002), have held that a federal tax lien attaches to the rights of the taxpayer held as tenancy-by-the-entireties. While too long to address in these Tax Tips, this Notice is an excellent guideline to the law in this area, and is in a question and answer format.

Advice:
In advising your clients that “tenancy-by-the-entireties” properties are exempt from creditors of one spouse, do not forget to advise the clients about the Internal Revenue Service tax lien exception.

Gift Taxes Are Brought Back Into The Estate
In Brown, 91 AFTR 2d 2003-2085 (CA- 9,0203), the decedent, Willet Brown, established an irrevocable life insurance trust to hold insurance on his wife’s life. To fund the life insurance trust Mr. Brown gave his wife a gift, and then Mrs. Brown immediately wrote a check to the life insurance trust from her own checking account. Mrs. Brown then filed a gift tax return for the transfer to the life insurance trust. The gift tax liability was paid by Mr. Brown to his wife and she, in turn, wrote a check to the Internal Revenue Service.

Mr. Brown died within 3 years of the gift taxes being paid, and the IRS sought to bring the gift taxes paid by Mrs. Brown back into Mr. Brown’s estate under Section 2035 of the Code. The IRS argued that under the step-transaction doctrine the taxes were paid by Willet Brown and, therefore, would be taxable within his estate.

All the parties admitted that Mrs. Brown had no contractual obligation to use the money her husband gave her to pay the gift taxes, but the court found that the step-transaction applied, and the paid gift taxes should be included in Mr. Brown’s estate since he died within 3 years of the gift taxes being paid.

Advice:
If planning on the above, then it would be best for time to lapse between the gift to the spouse and his or her payment of the gift tax. Alternatively, Mrs. Brown could have borrowed money and then paid it back from the proceeds of the estate.

All Contents © Copyright Linda Suzzanne Griffin, P.A.